เข้าสู่ระบบ สมัครสมาชิก

neutrality of money การใช้

ประโยคมือถือ
  • "' Superneutrality of money "'is a stronger property than neutrality of money.
  • Furthermore, some New Keynesian models confirm the non-neutrality of money under several conditions.
  • Neutrality of money has been a central question for monetarism.
  • Different theories can be judged by their implied ideas as to the neutrality of money.
  • Consequently, they will not adjust production and the neutrality of money occurs even in the short-run.
  • When neutrality of money coincides with zero population growth, the economy is said to rest in " steady-state equilibrium ".
  • However, based on sticky prices and other rigidities, the synthesis does not embrace the complete neutrality of money proposed by earlier new classical economists.
  • With his 1972 paper on the non-neutrality of money, he had used high-tech math to bring into sharper focus the role of individuals'expectations in economic life.
  • It also emphatically rejects the neutrality of money, believing instead that the money supply and its growth or decline are critical to the functioning of the economy.
  • Post-Keynesian economics and monetary circuit theory reject the neutrality of money, instead emphasizing the role that bank lending and credit play in the creation of bank money.
  • Keynes's biographer Robert Skidelsky writes that the post-Keynesian school has remained closest to the spirit of Keynes's work in following his monetary theory and rejecting the neutrality of money.
  • It was in 1972 that Robert Lucas of the University of Chicago succeeded in publishing a highly technical and mathematical paper called " Expectations and the Neutrality of Money . " ( It was rejected by the leading journal of the day . ) The global inflation rate was barely creeping up; its dizzying OPEC phase was still a year away.
  • Thus Say's law, in its original concept, was not intrinsically linked nor logically reliant on the neutrality of money ( as has been alleged by those who wish to disagree with it ), because the key proposition of the law is that no matter how much people save, production is still a possibility, as it is the prerequisite for the attainment of any additional consumption goods.